Zoo Community & Writer's Guild
Bad text? - Printable Version

+- Zoo Community & Writer's Guild (https://zoowg.org)
+-- Forum: Zoophilia discussions (https://zoowg.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: General Zoo discourse (https://zoowg.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=42)
+--- Thread: Bad text? (/showthread.php?tid=552)

Pages: 1 2 3


Bad text? - caikgoch - 02-17-2018


Quote:
1 hour ago, littlejohn said:




They claim a 'study' but don't referece it showing correlation between zoo sex and fuckinh little children.




I'd like to see the study




 




It doesn't exist and it wouldn't matter if it did.       Did you know that the number one predictor of sexual predation is a heterosexual orientation?





Bad text? - littlejohn - 02-17-2018


It's like the 'gateway' argument for marijuana.  There's closer correlation with milk.  And, CORRELATION IS >NOT< CAUSALITY.




Bad text? - 30-30 - 02-17-2018


Quote:
On ‎16‎.‎02‎.‎2018 at 3:05 AM, Mfkfznfp said:




Wondering if anyone read the first two paragraphs of the bill -- that is what I was talking about (the question is, what do others think about those first two paragraphs?)




It doesn´t matter in the slightest what has been written in the text you linked. Yeah, I read it..and yeah, still won´t change a fucking thing about the general hostility towards any "animal fuck issues" in society. Your constant complaints in "zoo friendly" places only equals sucking your own dick...plus I still have a certain suspicion about you being an *agent provocateur* who seems to have nothing else in mind but luring people dumb enough to get irate about "this injustice" out there into the limelight, literally throwing them under the bus and chuckle while they are squished to death. Way in all deities´ names don´t YOU try to challenge this "unjust laws", why is the only thing you do your usual "whine and cheese" routine? If you want something done, ya better do it yourself, man! If you feel you have the upper hand and can easily debunk all of this text, then why aren´t you already standing in front of your highest court to revoke this "injustice"? 




And why the hell is all of your ranting so eerily similar to what cults of any colour do? Never adressing the problems within your cult, but blaming literally everyone and everything instead? Democracy = what the majority wants becomes law = the majority doesn´t want to encourage animal fuckers of any couleur = laws prohibiting animal fuckery are created. And this has nothing to do with denied "tolerance" since we "noble zoos" can´t even debunk the main issues in our orientation, consent and power imbalance. As far as I am concerned, I absolutely subscribe to what countries all over the world have done within the last few years, making "zoophilia" (or what sex with animals is commonly falsely called now) illegal as a deterrent for all those "curious" bored idiots and also giving more leverage to authorities in incidents like the Espenau case and an entire scene of "animal pornographists". I even say that making "zoophilia" illegal is totally legit...the only thing that´s missing is certain regulations making it for those among us who can objectively prove that their "zoophilia" has no bad consequences for the animal involved...like the "geduuit" policy the Netherlands pursues with cannabis...it´s not legal in the NL, but minor cases won´t face any prosecution. 




 





Bad text? - Mfkfznfp - 02-23-2018


Quote:
On 2/17/2018 at 2:03 PM, littlejohn said:




It's like the 'gateway' argument for marijuana.  There's closer correlation with milk.  And, CORRELATION IS >NOT< CAUSALITY.




What I would say is, (regarding correlation/causality), why are these people getting away with these illogical arguments? (And no one questioning them)? So many bills have appeared with almost identical reasons for wanting to ban it, and no one questions those reasons.





Bad text? - egoldstein - 02-23-2018


Quote:
1 hour ago, Mfkfznfp said:




What I would say is, (regarding correlation/causality), why are these people getting away with these illogical arguments? (And no one questioning them)? So many bills have appeared with almost identical reasons for wanting to ban it, and no one questions those reasons.




Because when a legislator opposes it, no matter how stupid it is, they get lambasted for it and accused of supporting "animal rape". I remember a few years ago when a few bills were going through and I believe someone in NH opposed the law because it was logically flawed and poor legislation and I don't think they got anything but grief for the effort.





Bad text? - littlejohn - 02-23-2018



true dat.  dope or dogs.




 





Bad text? - Cynolove693 - 02-24-2018


Quote:
On 2/22/2018 at 10:51 PM, egoldstein said:




Because when a legislator opposes it, no matter how stupid it is, they get lambasted for it and accused of supporting "animal rape". I remember a few years ago when a few bills were going through and I believe someone in NH opposed the law because it was logically flawed and poor legislation and I don't think they got anything but grief for the effort.




Exactly; even if the laws are flawed, and animals consent and enjoy sex, it won't change anything; these legislators will not oppose a law that the public is for, it will only cause trouble, and rebellion from every anti zoo in their state.. 





Bad text? - Cynolove693 - 02-24-2018


Quote:
On 2/16/2018 at 8:30 PM, littlejohn said:




They claim a 'study' but don't referece it showing correlation between zoo sex and fuckinh little children.




I'd like to see the study




 




That's because there isn't any "study" that without a doubt links zoophilia to pedophilia; its propaganda to turn society against the idea of sex with animals; what better way to outcast a minority, than to link them to someone who has no self control and has sex with underdeveloped children??




BTW there is studies viewing some cases where prison inmates that were pedophiles were also sexually attracted to animals, that is most likely where they got that information from, but these instances were far and few, (rather rare occurence for the two sexualities to correlate) and its very far from fact to say, (again biased misleading information) just because one person is that way, that all zoosexuals are, that's like saying all heterosexuals must be gay as well just because some people are bisexual..





Bad text? - egoldstein - 02-24-2018


Quote:
34 minutes ago, Cynolove693 said:




That's because there isn't any "study" that without a doubt links zoophilia to pedophilia; its propaganda to turn society against the idea of sex with animals; what better way to outcast a minority, than to link them to someone who has no self control and has sex with underdeveloped children??




BTW there is studies viewing some cases where prison inmates that were pedophiles were also sexually attracted to animals, that is most likely where they got that information from, but these instances were far and few, (rather rare occurence for the two sexualities to correlate) and its very far from fact to say, (again biased misleading information) just because one person is that way, that all zoosexuals are, that's like saying all heterosexuals must be gay as well just because some people are bisexual..




I didn't see a reference to a particular study, but if they are referring to the data I think they are, then a more apt parallel to draw from that data is that nearly 100% of the sexual predators were heterosexual males. Using the supplied reasoning then it's clear we need laws making heterosexual sex illegal. It's the only way to protect our children!!!





Bad text? - Cynolove693 - 02-24-2018


Quote:
45 minutes ago, egoldstein said:




I didn't see a reference to a particular study, but if they are referring to the data I think they are, then a more apt parallel to draw from that data is that nearly 100% of the sexual predators were heterosexual males. Using the supplied reasoning then it's clear we need laws making heterosexual sex illegal. It's the only way to protect our children!!!




See you understand exactly what I was saying; sarcasm aside; these are ridiculous tactical conclusions about zoophilia just used to further fuel hate and bigotry; fact is they are derived from minor instances, and posed as the "truth" of all zoophiles.. You can't base a whole entire sexual preference on the habits of a few people that have other deviant behaviors that are not even related to zoophilia, and say all the sudden there's absolutely no difference between two entirely different sexualities..