• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Legal Blackmail?
#1


from  https://articles.syracuse.com/state/inde...iality.amp




Defense at Upstate NY murder trial accuses prosecution witness of sex act with dog



Updated on Nov 10, 2017 at 01:22 AM EST



 



<a title="Connect with Author">By Tribune News Service </a>




<div>
 

</div>



TROY, N.Y. -- An Upstate New York murder trial took a bizarre turn Thursday when his defense attorney accused a key prosecution witness of having a sexual encounter with a dog and logging onto numerous bestiality websites.




"I did not have sex with a dog," the witness, Amanda Whitman, repeatedly testified in Rensselaer County Court during cross-examination by Assistant Public Defender William Roberts.




The attorney for defendant Johnny Oquendo pressed Whitman about an alleged self-shot video of her engaging in a sex act with a dog -- and threatened to play it in court to impeach her credibility.




Whitman, the ex-girlfriend of the defendant, later invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination several times because she could potentially be charged with sexual misconduct, a misdemeanor sexual offense, for alleged sex with animals. The judge appointed a lawyer, Matthew Foley, to represent her right, and he advised her as she took the Fifth.




Roberts mentioned the names of numerous websites Whitman had logged onto that implied she had an interest in sexual relations between humans and horses, gorillas and chimpanzees. He contends that her browser history indicated she viewed hundreds of the sites.




Oquendo, 40, is accused of strangling his 21-year-old stepdaughter, Noel Alkaramla, on Nov. 22, 2015, in his third-floor apartment at 170 Third Street in Troy.




Prosecutors allege Oquendo used a plastic supermarket shopping bag to strangle Alkaramla, then stuffed her body in a suitcase, dragged the luggage to the Hudson River and tossed it in the water. The suitcase was recovered Dec. 30, 2015, near Albany.




Whitman is expected to testify that the black-and-gray Ricardo Beverly Hills suitcase is the same piece of luggage Oquendo had owned when they were dating.


Quote: <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
Testimony continues in Oquendo murder trial, with a bizarre twist. https://t.co/4d5hx3TLIx pic.twitter.com/FEhRjiI8Uc


-- CBS 6 Albany - WRGB (@CBS6Albany) November 9, 2017

Assistant District Attorney Andrew Botts asked Whitman some brief questions about her past text-messaging with Alkaramla. The prosecutor ended his questioning of Whitman after just a few minutes with plans to recall her next week when he will have laid more of a legal foundation.




On cross-examination, Roberts initially suggested Oquendo and Whitman had broken up in 2015 after she had found compromising photos of him with Alkaramla. Whitman said it was untrue.




Roberts then moved on to Whitman's alleged activity with animals. The defense attorney asked her if it was true that she turned over her cellphone to Troy police, and with it the alleged sexual encounter with the dog.




"Incorrect," Whitman responded.




Roberts asked Whitman if she would agree with him that there was a video of her and a dog.




"Correct -- but that was after my relationship with Johnny Oquendo," Whitman answered.




"Ohh," Roberts responded sarcastically. "So you were having sex with a dog after your relationship with Mr. Oquendo?"




"I did not have sex with the dog," she replied.




Roberts asked Whitman if she created two videos with dogs and her without her clothes.




Whitman hedged. Roberts said, "Would viewing those videos refresh your recollection? "




"I would not like to view those videos," Whitman answered.




"Would reviewing those videos," Roberts replied, "refresh your recollection of what dog you were having sex with?"




"I did not have sex with a dog," Whitman repeated.



At one point, while preparing to play the video, Roberts asked the judge, "With or without sound?"




The video had not been played -- and Whitman had not yet testified about the suitcase -- when she left the stand Thursday. It was unclear what the prosecution had gained from her initial appearance.




Among the other witnesses who testified Thursday was Ricardo Leal, a records custodian for Sprint wireless who spoke about the cell phone records of Alkaramla and Oquendo.




Courts are closed Friday for Veterans Day. The trial will continue Monday at 9 a.m. The prosecution is expected to wrap up its case Tuesday. The defense, which includes Assistant Public Defender Jessica Zwicklbauer, will present their case.




-- Robert Gavin, Times Union, Albany, N.Y.




 




I generally don't like mentioning name but I don't see how to make it worse than testimony in open court unless someone knows this woman and speaks out.   So please don't.




There are some useful lessons here.      Do you use SPRINT?       Do you have an ex that knows?        Do you believe in honest lawyers?





 


  Reply
#2


I'm following this case too, and was disgusted by the defense attorneys attempt to draw attention away from the slug he defends and his horrible act. That is what defense attorneys are supposed to do though. 




Did she engage in a sexual act with a dog? Probably. Should that detract from her ability to testify against him? Only if she lied about it, which she probably did now.




sw


  Reply
#3


WOW .. can't use a witness that can identify a suitcase because she might have had sex with a dog ... un fucking belieavable




How does that prove she is not a credible witness




Seems like saying you can't use a eyewitness to a murder with cell phone footage of it because the witness happens to own an adult novelty shop ... or has been arrested for prostitution .. or almost anything




 


  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)