05-01-2020, 10:34 AM
I want to somewhat clarify the above. Or murk it up. Bestiality, though lust driven, is not ALWAYS a fetish driven act. I did not mean to imply that it was. It can be a fetish is all I was saying. Zoophilia can include the act of bestiality as part of it's expression. That does not make it a fetish. Bestiality can be performed by itself, with no other motive than the enjoyment it gives the animals, human & nonhuman, and there is no fetishistic attachment involved (to some, that defines "Zoophilia"). There are many other instances.
A fetish is an unnatural attachment to an object for sexual gratification, with no care for the object involved. There are so many bestialists who care at least that their partners enjoy the sex, if not care more..
sw
