08-10-2017, 02:52 AM
Quote:​Be that as it may, let's break down the definition of orientation shall we..
There's evidence showing that homosexuality and heterosexuality as distinct orientations with a genetic basis. I'm not aware of there being any evidence for zoophilia being an unchosen, inborn trait, maybe it is, but without evidence to support the claim, it's just an assertion of opinion and no more valid than other, unfounded suppositions.
If anyone has evidence to back up the claim I'd love to see it, but without that, the offered retort has no more weight than what it's intended to disprove. We might prefer it, but that doesn't make it true.
1. A familiarization with something
2. the direction of someone's interest or attitude, especially political or sexual
3. in Behaviorism is mentally directing attention or physically directing the body towards a stimulus of some kind
4. Sexual Orientation is a term used to describe our patterns of emotional, romantic, and sexual attraction—and our sense of personal and social identity based on those attractions. A person's sexual orientation is not a black or white matter; sexual orientation exists along a continuum, with exclusive attraction to the opposite sex on one end of the continuum and exclusive attraction to the same sex on the other, but it sometimes implies either or..
Claiming that in order for an orientation to be true; you have to have a genetic basis backing it does not apply for "all" orientations.. Some can be psychological, it is entirely possible to be attracted to something from the start but not be based biologically towards it.. You have the right to show skepticism, but are the above definitions not applicable to zoophilia?
