"Is acceptance possible?" thread

[Cynolove693]

Now I do wanna add that there is a rare exception where an animal may only want to mate with humans and turn down other animals; my pitbull i had in my teens done this; she turned down any male who tried to mount her while she was in heat, but was always receptive to me.. it does happen, I do believe animals posses the ability to love romantically, though a big majority will not stay monogamous for the sake of love the way a human would.. 




To my point.. judging the other majority; that is having sex for the sake of lust is quite hypocritical when "zoos" have sex out of lust as well; yes feelings of love are there or develop with time; but you can't really be into it; if your not into it; you can't have sex without feelings of lust.. period..  As long as no harm is being done; the animal is well cared for, what difference does it make? So what if someone has a "animal with benefits".. as long as the animal is happy who is to say it's wrong..




This mentality of dividing amongst ourselves is getting us nowhere, as for the original idea for this thread; I do not think acceptance will be possible anytime soon; when we can't even come to a civil grounds amongst ourselves; or accept our own differences..

On 12/17/2017 at 5:11 PM, Cynolove693 said:




@Vermillion I feel sorry that you've never been able to feel love; it really is a beautiful feeling, your missing out on




OK before I continue I will say that I am a zoophile/zoosexual, I love animals and also have sexual attractions to them..




As for the "morality" of "zoos" I have to say this; it's gonna stir up the pot; maybe even piss certain people off; but it needs to be said though; here we go..




The idea that people who have sex with animals without romantic attachment are somehow a lesser person; or morally wrong is a flawed way of thinking; let me ask these questions..




Do these "beasties" cause harm to an animal buy not falling in romantic love with them?? Why are people comparing human views of relationships to animals?? Does the animal care about monagomus relationships or have a human way of thinking about relationships?? Do animals relate sexual feelings to love???? Have you not ever had sex for the fun of it without any attachments???




How can we expect to gain acceptance if we can't even accept the other majority of us that has sex with animals? A majority which isn't really much different from us... Another question; does a "beastie" having consenual sex cause harm to an animal??? In order for something to be "morally wrong" shouldn't it entitle being harmful??




Implying human idealism on an animal is the whole issue here; they are not human; You really think that lack of romantic feelings would stop an animal from Mating and enjoy the experience??




Now don't get me wrong I believe animals do love; but they do not love in the same way we do.. and they do not relate sex with love; or have a monagomus way of loving.. 




Yes your animal may show romantic love towards you but do you think they would stay faithful if the neighbors horse/dog went into heat down the road??? No because animals act out of instinct and opportunistict behaviors; a trait which was lost in humans along the way; and if someone does posses these traits and has sex without a connection it's considered "morally wrong" no it's flawed morality; it's ego at its finest; it's somehow I'm better than you even though our sexuality is the same..