Quote:
16 hours ago, caikgoch said:
I've never seen a more generous gift to anyone wanting to strike down these laws on Constitutional grounds.
So did you read the first two paragraphs of the bill? They're so awful that I don't even feel like quoting them.
They (the paragraphs) say that sex with animals needs to be banned because zoos might commit crimes which are unrelated to sex with animals, and that because of "connections" between zoos and unrelated crimes, zoos are dangerous to society. The bill also says that sex with animals is a "predictor" of other unrelated crimes, and that zoos are "potentially dangerous sexual predators". This is bullshit in my opinion.
Also, they did not sample from many different people, their sample (of their "study") was only of criminals, so that would influence the results (it did not represent all zoos, only a handful of criminals).
But the thing is, who is going to speak out against this bullshit?
