• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bad text?
#13

Quote:
On ‎16‎.‎02‎.‎2018 at 3:05 AM, Mfkfznfp said:




Wondering if anyone read the first two paragraphs of the bill -- that is what I was talking about (the question is, what do others think about those first two paragraphs?)




It doesn´t matter in the slightest what has been written in the text you linked. Yeah, I read it..and yeah, still won´t change a fucking thing about the general hostility towards any "animal fuck issues" in society. Your constant complaints in "zoo friendly" places only equals sucking your own dick...plus I still have a certain suspicion about you being an *agent provocateur* who seems to have nothing else in mind but luring people dumb enough to get irate about "this injustice" out there into the limelight, literally throwing them under the bus and chuckle while they are squished to death. Way in all deities´ names don´t YOU try to challenge this "unjust laws", why is the only thing you do your usual "whine and cheese" routine? If you want something done, ya better do it yourself, man! If you feel you have the upper hand and can easily debunk all of this text, then why aren´t you already standing in front of your highest court to revoke this "injustice"? 




And why the hell is all of your ranting so eerily similar to what cults of any colour do? Never adressing the problems within your cult, but blaming literally everyone and everything instead? Democracy = what the majority wants becomes law = the majority doesn´t want to encourage animal fuckers of any couleur = laws prohibiting animal fuckery are created. And this has nothing to do with denied "tolerance" since we "noble zoos" can´t even debunk the main issues in our orientation, consent and power imbalance. As far as I am concerned, I absolutely subscribe to what countries all over the world have done within the last few years, making "zoophilia" (or what sex with animals is commonly falsely called now) illegal as a deterrent for all those "curious" bored idiots and also giving more leverage to authorities in incidents like the Espenau case and an entire scene of "animal pornographists". I even say that making "zoophilia" illegal is totally legit...the only thing that´s missing is certain regulations making it for those among us who can objectively prove that their "zoophilia" has no bad consequences for the animal involved...like the "geduuit" policy the Netherlands pursues with cannabis...it´s not legal in the NL, but minor cases won´t face any prosecution. 




 


  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Bad text? - by Mfkfznfp - 02-14-2018, 04:13 AM
Bad text? - by 30-30 - 02-14-2018, 05:32 AM
Bad text? - by Ramseys - 02-14-2018, 06:36 AM
Bad text? - by 30-30 - 02-14-2018, 07:07 AM
Bad text? - by Mfkfznfp - 02-16-2018, 02:05 AM
Bad text? - by Rannoch - 02-16-2018, 06:27 AM
Bad text? - by caikgoch - 02-16-2018, 07:38 AM
Bad text? - by littlejohn - 02-16-2018, 03:29 PM
Bad text? - by Mfkfznfp - 02-16-2018, 11:39 PM
Bad text? - by littlejohn - 02-17-2018, 01:30 AM
Bad text? - by caikgoch - 02-17-2018, 02:51 AM
Bad text? - by littlejohn - 02-17-2018, 02:03 PM
Bad text? - by 30-30 - 02-17-2018, 06:30 PM
Bad text? - by Mfkfznfp - 02-23-2018, 02:31 AM
Bad text? - by egoldstein - 02-23-2018, 03:51 AM
Bad text? - by littlejohn - 02-23-2018, 06:32 PM
Bad text? - by Cynolove693 - 02-24-2018, 04:36 PM
Bad text? - by Cynolove693 - 02-24-2018, 04:46 PM
Bad text? - by egoldstein - 02-24-2018, 05:34 PM
Bad text? - by Cynolove693 - 02-24-2018, 06:19 PM
Bad text? - by Cynolove693 - 02-24-2018, 06:26 PM
Bad text? - by egoldstein - 02-25-2018, 12:56 AM
Bad text? - by heavyhorse - 03-18-2018, 12:03 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)