03-27-2018, 12:03 AM
Quote:
2 hours ago, heavyhorse said:
And I'm thinking that people who draw every species with human dicks probably don't have any secret agenda, they just draw animal porn without having the least bit of actual knowledge of animals. And that degree of ignorance is disturbing. You'd think people with sex on their mind would take a bit more interest in the natural world around them.
In fact, this ignorance isn´t the least little bit disturbing. I´ve always wondered why our community feels so close to furrydom when this fandom mostly is about HUMAN roleplay, a form of escapism. Real interest in animals and their anatomy isn´t required to play, much like you don´t need to know how to properly strike with a real sword if you´re a "WoW warrior".
So, absolutely not disturbing, it´s just not required to have actual knowledge about animal genitalia..and I´m pretty sure that anatomical accuracy would even drive off a whole lot of furries from their fandom, because most of them can´t even imagine having real sex with a real animal..it´s basically about humans in costumes. The human component is vital. That´s why MLP has "bronies" dressing up like their favourite "pony", but Mr Ed never gathered a comparably insane fanbase. Too much of a real animal, with only an overdubbed voice. And that´s coming from a guy who uses the name of THE prototypical horse-human cartoon character...
What makes it even more obvious is that nearly every "furryporn" is sticking very closely to the basic formula of human porn. That illustrates how even the smaller percentage of furries, those who do carry their "furryness" into their sexuality, are still basically human and function with human sexual triggers. The animal component is novelty or fetish, but not at all linked to real sexuality with animals...it stays human.
One more thing: if you´re a , let´s say,real life firefighter, you don´t need to constantly walk around in your firefighter stuff to reassure yourself of what you are. You don´t need forums to get the reassurement from other "firefighters". In fact, it would be a pretty huge sign of you having some issues if you´d need that. A firefighter does not need to play a firefighter, he just is one. He does not need to rub it into everyone´s faces, he just is. And transposing this onto the so called furries, it´s practically the same...the more they need their "community" and reassurement of their "animal" personae, the easier it is to tell that they´re probably not even close to what they insist on being. A real animal does not have to convince you of it being an animal, it doesn´t need a fur costume, it doesn´t need a echo chamber community for that. It is fantasy, nothing more...most of the furries even hate zoophiles from their guts. Like most of the gays do...and I still wonder why our community keeps clinging to those two groups like an old chewing gum sticking onto the pavement. There´s literally no connection, a few exceptions left aside.
I am a zoo. I want a real mare , not some kind of weird biped mare with boobs and a human vagina. I´m even more appalled by such depictions than from human porn...and that really says something here. To me, most of the furry stuff feels like an awful mockery and I know that many zoos feel the same...just as we´re being made fun of in a very disrespectful manner. I want a real , 100% animal, not this crossover human stuff. I want mares who are mares, not humans with an equine shell. I want mares who act like a mare, with all "yucky" animal stuff that´s involved. I don´t want human genitalia, not when they´re attached to a human and especially not when they´re attached to a infantilised animal-human hybrid watching Walt Disney cartoons in your childhood is mostly to blame for. Just my opinion on this, not meant as an insult to anyone, just my personal views on something I as a zoo have a hard time to tolerate. Anyone is free to participate in furrydom, but I demand my own liberty to not take anyone seriously who identifies as part of this "culture".
