04-08-2018, 07:45 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-08-2018, 07:50 AM by AmoreBestia.)
The same argument against it was used by another person I know. Of course, it was my mistake for not including this detail in the first place after that conversation. The simple solution is to encourage people at little to no risk to push their contributions; eg no longer practicing or EoL zoos. Dilute "Wet Goddess" with more sane literature written over a zoophile's lifetime and published at a point when there's insufficient evidence to convict left, not enough time remaining for it to matter, or post mortem. Even if a well spoken zoo only has five years of life to respond to interviews and such, that's still a boon to the cause
There's no expectation of some kind of PR victory mind, there never was. Spin will happen either way but loathe as the ones that can keep up with appearances may be to do it, it's necessary to avoid absolute PR disasters like Brennan. And, frankly, it's not out of the question to defeat the spin, at least in the capacity that they can't turn your words against you. With Brennan's interview, the journalists didn't have to do anything, he spun the article against zoos with his own words. The ones that are choosy with their words and give antagonistic journalists a run for their money will make people take notice in a good way either way, and help keep people on the fence closer to your side.
