04-09-2018, 12:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-09-2018, 12:51 AM by Cynolove693.)
Quote:
26 minutes ago, AmoreBestia said:
I literally said in the same paragraph that they should publish sane literature and be well spoken, so I'm not sure why you thought this added to the conversation.
And regarding your example, I'm not sure what you're trying to prove. That's one person with weak personal alignments that, conveniently, didn't once mention that most animal porn isn't shot for the benefit of zoophiles but 'normies' themselves, never mentioned that many zoophiles themselves completely abstain from IRL animal pornography for the very purpose of keeping ad revenue away from those studios, didn't voice their personal convictions on the matter as a framework for their perspective, never once asked for or provided sources for claims, and, if your goal was to create a representative that encompassed generalities that can be applied to the majority, failed to recognize that honest public speech on the matter is critical in the long term as well as a popular perspective, and on top of that allowed the conversation to be completely overtaken by a single issue which doesn't represent the larger moral standing of zoophiles. That wasn't a well spoken representative, that was a character that you made toothless in the conversation because you disagreed with the zoophile you manufactured. It's not an example, it's a story written solely for your benefit.
This ^^^
Something also worth mentioning is zoosadist's are far and few, most zoophiles do actually care about their animals well being, I however do agree with some points 30:30 was trying to make
Specifically the fact that there is abuse out their and not many people speak out against it (don't believe me take a trip to beastforum; which I may add is a pretty relevant example being as its the largest community out there; go to the porn section, eventually you'll run across it) ive even seen so called "zoos" comment postively to that shit; for example: "your girls got a nice pussy" or "he's got a big dick" when its a puppy.. what makes it even worse is the forum had rules against posting abusive material, yet it most of the time remains on the site, untouched.. (I even been banned from there for speaking out against such material, goes to show you the kind of people the mods are there)
To some it up I agree with what 30:30 is trying to say, in order for society to accept zoophilia we'd have to weed out the wrongdoers from our community, whether they like us doing so or not, but it wouldn't be just here, it would be all "zoo" communities.. Which I don't see happening, same with zoophilia ever becoming legal
