06-03-2018, 11:01 PM
Hm. The only woman I know who I'd call a "zoo" refuses that label, and I knew her long before I knew the label. She loves her GSDs, and turned Tippy and I into a couple, yet considers herself only a bestialist because she enjoys having sex with her dogs.
I've long been a mouthpiece against seeing visual porn as representative of any zoophilic ideals or beliefs. Even the home-made is distributed for reasons of stimulation of others, not love of your partner, no matter why it was originally made. My own is witness to that. Even written porn should be judged with a grain of salt for what it represents or projects.
I too believe males far outnumber females IN THE ONLINE ZOO COMMUNITY. I doubt these numbers hold true in real life. I believe the same for gay/ bi versus straight. I do not know why this is, but it is my experience online, and common sense in real life, that make me believe it.
I don't believe the sex represents the zoophilia, nor the other way round. Read into that what you will, but I've had sex with many animals (and women in my case) I've had no romantic attachment to or for, and a few I have had such for. Any who say they haven't done I suspect to be either a virgin or a liar.
On Topic- I find your experiences in hormone therapy and their relation to zoophilic feelings interesting. I wonder if this would hold true in other experiments.
sw
