11-19-2018, 07:46 PM
Quote:
13 hours ago, WinterGreenWolf said:
Don't know much about Spink, unfortunately I think 'good contact' is going to be very hard to come by. At least under normal circumstances. I've been 'sort of' reaching out through friends and whatnot to see if anyone is interested in talking to me about the subject.
There's a problem though, I'd basically need to make 'scrap accounts' to whatever service was deemed to be used for the purposes, get a couple hours of free time, and set up my VPN, Kill switch, and TOR to keep any IP, DNS, and unencrypted traffic from being leaked during the 'contact'.
Like I said: with 'accusations of Zoophilia! OMG!!!' and other bullshit from 'Kero the Wolf's fuck up (possible fuck up? Nah, from the logs he does seem to have fucked up...) we're going to have to play activism a little more careful.
I do check places like Reddit from time to time too: see if there's any new threads on the subject or even start an AMA, I may start one regardless, problem is Reddit is so hive-minded and full of trolls I doubt it'd go anywhere.
For info on Spink, a quick google search will work wonders. [img]<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/wink.png[/img]/emoticons/[email protected] 2x" title=";)" width="20" /> No, seriously, just search for "Doug Spink" and you´ll be able to choose from all kinds of sources, more biased ones like his entry in the Encyclopedia dramatica and legit journalistic articles about the smuggling of more than 370 pounds of cocaine, his ownership of lots of bestiality porn websites and a few "zoo" blogs, his strange connections to the Enumclaw "posse" that made him call in to the Tennessee authorities in order to back up Tait, the one who was the owner of some property (not a farm!) where the Enumclaw "club" occasionally gathered to "zoophiliate" random animals (he was sued and convicted of trespassing, another strong hint that the Enumclaw case checked many boxes of a literal "zoo" brothel -esque type of modus operandi). If you survived the Kero shitfest, Spink is harmless in comparison, so don´t be afraid to do some internet research.
On reddit: well, you´re surely right about reddit being an utter hiveminded bubble, and I´d strongly advise against doing stuff like AMAs there. Funny you have the same habit of browsing reddit, I also do it with the relevant keywords from time to time to stay updated. As I said before, social media is not the right "weapon" to equip when it comes to zoophilia. You´ll get one, maybe two folks who are open for debate, the rest will just pour their prejudices over you without any restraint or respect.If you really want to do something meaningful for our orientation, focus on science instead. Contact sexologists, for example. On the ZETA hp, there was a guy summarising what we really should be heading for. He said that it´s not a matter of another Miletski, another Beetz et al. , he said that we´re missing first and foremost actual scientifically validated data regarding zoophilia. Data that can be reproduced, data that cannot be discussed away. All we have ´til now is anecdotal "evidence" that massively suffers from lack of validation , yet it has been presented as validated because Miletski befriended her study subjects more than it´s good in the sense of unbiased scientific work.If there is something that can be done about zoophilia´s reception in society , then it has to be standing on hard scientific facts, not wishywashy "studies" and unvalidated hearsay. Get a scientist interested , get him/her to do actual research, with measurable and reproducable evidence. If anything external will change anything , then it´s this.
