03-20-2018, 01:45 AM
Quote:
On 3/18/2018 at 11:38 AM, heavyhorse said:
And BTW, the notion that "we allow" BF to do or say -anything- representative of zoo, fails to realize that they are a porn aristocracy. Google the parent outfit, they have different sites for a dozen fetishes, completely unrelated to animals. Admin#1 even professes to never having been with an animal. It's the family business. There's a core of family admin; they specifically say "this is not a democracy"; members that dare to hint even privately about differing opinions are banned and variously sanctioned (they are adamant about tracking members). So "allowing" or "not allowing" the largest and most visible animal sex board to define public opinion is not an option.
Presumably, in this case, it could be argued that additional law in the countries they shuttle BF to, to the extent that they were shut down, would actually advance the legitimate zoo cause.
Silverwolf: Please feel free to edit or delete after folks have a chance to read, if you think mentioning of BF will adversely affect this board. [img]<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/ph34r.png[/img]/emoticons/[email protected] 2x" title=":ph34r:" width="20" />
Thx.
It's been mentioned many times before, and will be again. No worries.
BTW, no forum is a democracy, including this one, but you're quite right about any "squeaky wheel" being banned there.
sw
