>.>

[Eagle]

6 hours ago, 30-30 said:




And be assured that no exclusive feels "superior" about being an exclusive, no one will turn a non exclusive down, belittle his or such things...IF the non exclusive isn´t insisting on a title he/she doesn´t qualify for.

Unfortunately, I have seen far too many examples over twenty years of being in the community of zoos using the title abusively.  In at least one case, a fake -- I saw someone troll less experienced zoos for their not being "zoo exclusive" and yet the troll had actually previously propositioned me, telling me his "bedroom was open to me."  I am not saying you are like this, but there are definitely those who are.  Its perhaps unfair for you to get stereotyped based on what others do, but it does happen.


Hell, I knew someone who claimed to be a zoophile seemingly because he wanted to get into the bedrooms of zoophiles ... and he did so with my first boyfriend, but he was a fake through and through.  He had a gorgeous sexy female dog, but I found she was a virgin.  Not only that, but he completely neglected her ... I had to give her food, water and attention because he did not give her any of those things.  He wasn't sexually interested in our goat, dogs or the exotic deer my boyfriend got ... he was only sexually interested in us.  And he wouldn't stop harrassing us for sex ... in fact he outright took advantage of me sexually in a situation several of my friends at the time describe as rape. [img]<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/unsure.png[/img]/emoticons/[email protected] 2x" title=":/" width="20" />