10-19-2018, 01:25 PM
Quote:
14 hours ago, covfefelake said:
I shouldn't respond to a banned user as I'm already on thin ice, but I'll do so as Rannoch was also banned from several communities (not here, so not blaming silverwolf) and I can't know your mental state. Let me say this reply is only to answer your question in hopes it will benefit your mental state and I really have no desire to converse on site further.
Rannoch seemed normal if a bit Autistic (mean no offense by that, and am only stating him because I knew him in person). Quite a few attitudes here (yours included, if you want me to be honest) are bizarre though, often times not in a good way. Paranoia, misanthropy, and misogyny are some I've seen in my limited time here.
That said, I've also seen some remarkably bright individuals capable of tremendous good. But I think the percentages of bad individuals are indeed higher, frankly.
That may be a condition of societies treatment of you. I'd certainly blame it on that before the zoophilia itself, if that's what you mean.
Also with both you and Rannoch there is quite a strong attatchment to names I have noted. Me? The internet is anonymous for a reason. That being said:
This is so bizarre. Are you openly admitting to banning usernames and not behaviors? What on earth does him coming back under another name and hiding accomplish if it's actually against your rules to ban evade a behavioral ban? You are practically endorsing that here. Please, at least pretend and be consistent / enforce the written rules?
Many banned users have returned to the places they were banned and continued without a pause. Most folk have gone through many usernames because of bans and other such hold-ups on their old ones. If I do not know who you are/ were I cannot effectively enforce a ban. I was simply highlighting this. It is a distasteful but common practice.
sw
